On October 2, 2018, Equal Access to Justice launched its 30th annual campaign to raise funds for three organizations that help meet the critical legal needs of New Mexicans. With the experience and support of a strong volunteer campaign committee, EAJ aims to raise at least $180,000 this campaign year. Campaign committee members include the following:

Dan Akenhead, Miller Stratvert                                      John Kelly, Bauman Dow & Stambaugh               
Mikal Altomare, PNM                                                       M. Karen Kilgore, Cuddy & McCarthy LLC           
Susan Bisong, Modrall Sperling                                     Barbara Koenig, Jackson Loman Stanford & Downey           
Amy Brown, Retired Attorney                                         Alisa Lauer, The Spence Law Firm
Susan G. Chappell, Susan G. Chappell Law Firm        Sireesha Manne, NM Center on Law & Poverty
Nancy Cronin, Duhigg, Cronin, Spring & Berlin            Ed Marks, New Mexico Legal Aid
Bruce Cottrell, Los Alamos National Laboratories      Bob McNeill, Law Offices of Robert P. McNeill
Mike Doyle, Attorney at Law                                           Bridget Mullins, Pregenzer Baysinger Wideman & Sale
Ella Joan Fenoglio, Attorney at Law                              Charles 'Kip' Purcell, Rodey Law Firm
Matthew L. Garcia, Attorney at Law                               Rodolfo D. Sanchez, DNA-People’s Legal Services
Peter Ives, The Trust for Public Land                            

On the evening of September 20, Santa Fe-area donors and supporters gathered at Cuddy & McCarthy to hear City Councilor (and DNA board member) Peter Ives speak about the about the critical need to expand civil legal services and advocacy across the state. State Senator Bill Tallman attended the event and committed to help secure more funding for legal aid from the legislature. Guests also heard from leaders from New Mexico Legal Aid (Ed Marks, Executive Director), DNA-People's Legal Services (Rodolfo Sanchez, Executive Director), and New Mexico Center on Law & Poverty (Sireesha Manne, Executive Director).

Sarita Nair, CAO, City of Albuquerque spoke about the importance and impact of contributions made to Equal Access to Justice to dozens of attorneys and other concerned New Mexicans gathered this morning at the Modrall Sperling law firm in downtown Albuquerque. Guests also heard from leaders from New Mexico Legal Aid (Ed Marks, Executive Director), DNA-People's Legal Services (Rudolfo Sanchez, Executive Director), and New Mexico Center on Law & Poverty (Sovereign Hager, Legal Director).

Featured on the KRQE morning show today were our Executive Director, Rachel Rodriguez with Sireesha Manne, Executive Director of the NM Center on Law & Poverty, and Sergio Barron, Rural Managing Attorney for New Mexico Legal Aid.
​
TO WATCH - https://www.krqe.com/…/non-profit-helping-local-…/1317831977

The New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, one of the nonprofits Equal Access to Justice supports, brought this case against the State of New Mexico.

SANTA FE, NM – July 20, 2018 – A state court ruled today that New Mexico’s education system violates the state constitution because it fails to provide students a sufficient public education.
​
Families and school districts in the consolidated lawsuit Yazzie v. State of New Mexico and Martinez v. State of New Mexico sued the state for failing to provide public school students with a sufficient education as mandated by the state’s constitution. The lawsuit challenged the state’s arbitrary and inadequate funding of public schools as well as its failure to provide students with the programs and services needed to be college, career and civic ready. It alleged that the lack of necessary monitoring and oversight deprived students of the resources and services they need to succeed—particularly low-income, students of color, including Native American, English-language learners, and students with disabilities.

​Continue reading here.

Thank you, American Bar Association Section of Litigation! A generous grant from the ABA provided a $500 grant to Equal Access to Justice to attend the 2018 Legal Services Fundraising Training Program. Our executive director and an attorney board member attended this intensive development training.

​BY ANDY MILLER, DIANA RUFF & BARBARA OTTE

January 27, 2018 01:58 PM

Updated January 27, 2018 01:58 PM

“Justice for all” is the cornerstone of our democratic society. If you are charged with a crime and can’t afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.

But for tens of thousands of low-income Washingtonians who face devastating civil legal crises, the same right to an attorney is not guaranteed. Subsequently, justice is denied.

Fortunately, there’s an answer — civil legal aid.

According to the 2015 Washington State Civil Legal Needs Study, three out of four of the 1.2 million Washingtonians living in poverty will face an urgent civil legal crisis every year, and only one in four will have access to legal help.
The study shows that the average low-income household in Washington faces more than nine legal issues every year — nearly triple the number from a decade earlier. Even one unresolved legal problem can escalate into a series of complex and interconnected challenges that quickly endanger health, safety or financial security.

Fortunately, our state has recognized the wisdom of supporting civil legal aid for many years, both as a way to lift people out of poverty and to ensure a more just place to live for all of us. Thanks to a bi-partisan embrace of the findings of the legal needs study, our lawmakers increased funding for legal aid by $4.8 million during the 2017 legislative session.

This was an important step in the right direction that will help thousands of low-income families. But, there is still more of a need, and families are in crisis today. Our legislature must continue to invest in civil legal aid.

Having legal assistance in a civil case can mean the difference between homelessness and a roof overhead for families. It can protect disabled veterans, vulnerable elderly couples or mentally ill individuals from being victimized.

It can ensure that people can live and work free of discrimination. It can guard a single mother’s ability to support her family, or a father’s safety on the job.

Just consider an example, from Benton County, where civil legal aid helped protect a child like Ashley (name changed for anonymity).

When Ashley was 16 years old, she was living with her mother and her mother’s boyfriend — though both were in and out of jail for drug abuse. The living situation was not only a distraction, it was dangerous. Ashley was a full-time high school student and held a job. She desperately wanted to live on her own.

The Benton Franklin Legal Aid Society connected Ashley with a pro bono attorney who helped her with a successful emancipation, giving her the legal freedom to sign a lease and live on her own. Ashley went on to graduate high school, now holds a full-time job managing a local grocery store, and has reestablished a relationship with her mother.

Thanks to civil legal aid, Ashley found the legal protection she needed to ensure her safety and future.

We owe everyone in our state the chance to enforce their rights and live in a just society, not just those who can afford an attorney. The justice system works most effectively and humanely when there is an even playing field for all.

And civil legal aid doesn’t only benefit those who receive that direct support; it creates a stronger and more vital Washington. When families’ civil legal issues are resolved, they can devote their energies to their jobs, their families and their communities. They can participate more fully in our economy and our democracy.

Lawmakers face another challenging session this year. The high-dollar demand to fund education and mental health will dwarf countless other requests. Yet, just like last year, an increase in civil legal aid funding should not be ignored even if bigger budget issues occupy the limelight.

A relatively small increase in funding for civil legal aid will yield a substantial return on investment that pays off when justice for all becomes a reality for all.

Andy Miller is the Benton County Prosecuting Attorney and chairs the State Prosecutors’ Special Assault Committee. Diana Ruff is the 2017-2018 President of the Benton Franklin County Bar Association. Barbara Otte has been the Executive Director of Benton Franklin Legal Aid since 2006 and is a member of the Washington State Pro Bono Council.

​ADEL, Ga. –  Billy Jerome Presley spent 17 months in a Georgia jail because he did not have $2,700 for a child support payment. He had no prior jail record but also no lawyer. In Baltimore last fall, Carl Hymes, 21, was arrested on charges of shining a laser into the eyes of a police officer. Bail was set at $75,000. He had no arrest record but also no lawyer. In West Orange, N.J., last summer, Walter Bloss, 89, was served with an eviction notice from the rent-controlled apartment he had lived in for 43 years after a dispute with his landlord. He had gone to court without a lawyer.

Fifty years ago, on March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that those accused of a crime have a constitutional right to a lawyer whether or not they can afford one. But as legal officials observe the anniversary of what is widely considered one of the most significant judicial declarations of equality under law, many say that the promise inherent in the Gideon ruling remains unfulfilled because so many legal needs still go unmet.

Civil matters -including legal issues like home foreclosure, job loss, spousal abuse and parental custody -were not covered by the decision. Today, many states and counties do not offer lawyers to the poor in major civil disputes, and in some criminal ones as well. Those states that do are finding that more people than ever are qualifying for such help, making it impossible to keep up with the need. The result is that even at a time when many law school graduates are without work, many Americans are without lawyers.

The Legal Services Corporation, the Congressionally financed organization that provides lawyers to the poor in civil matters, says there are more than 60 million Americans – 35 percent more than in 2005 -who qualify for its services. But it calculates that 80 percent of the legal needs of the poor go unmet. In state after state, according to a survey of trial judges, more people are now representing themselves in court and they are failing to present necessary evidence, committing procedural errors and poorly examining witnesses, all while new lawyers remain unemployed.

“Some of our most essential rights -those involving our families, our homes, our livelihoods – are the least protected,” Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson of the Texas Supreme Court, said in a recent speech at New York University. He noted that a family of four earning $30,000 annually does not qualify for legal aid in many states.

James J. Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, said, “Most Americans don’t realize that you can have your home taken away, your children taken away and you can be a victim of domestic violence but you have no constitutional right to a lawyer to protect you.”

According to the World Justice Project, a nonprofit group promoting the rule of law that got its start through the American Bar Association, the United States ranks 66th out of 98 countries in access to and affordability of civil legal services.

“In most countries, equality before the law means equality between those of high and low income,” remarked Earl Johnson Jr., a retired justice of the California Court of Appeal. “In this country for some reason we are concerned more with individuals versus government.”

With law school graduates hurting for work, it may appear that there is a glut of lawyers. But many experts say that is a misunderstanding.

“We don’t have an excess of lawyers,” said Martin Guggenheim, a law professor at New York University. “What we have is a miserable fit. In many areas like family and housing law, there is simply no private bar to go to. You couldn’t find a lawyer to help you even if you had the money because there isn’t a dime to be made in those cases.”

Even in situations where an individual is up against a state prosecutor and jail may result, not every jurisdiction provides lawyers to the defendants. In Georgia, those charged with failing to pay child support face a prosecutor and jail but are not supplied with a lawyer.

Mr. Presley lost his job in the recession and fell way behind on support payments for his four children. In 2011, he was jailed after a court proceeding without a lawyer in which he said he could not pay what he owed. He was brought back to court, shackled, every month or two.

Each time, he said he still could not pay. Each time, he was sent back.

A year later, he contacted a public defender who handles only criminal cases but who sent his case to the Southern Center for Human Rights. Atteeyah Hollie, a lawyer there, got him released that same day, helped him find work and set up a payment plan.

An important service lawyers can provide defendants like Mr. Presley is knowledge of what courts want -receipts of medical treatment, evidence of a job search, bank account statements. On their own, many people misstep when facing a judge.

In Adel, Ga., a town of 5,000, child support court meets monthly. On a recent morning, a dozen men in shackles and jail uniforms faced Chuck Reddick, a state prosecutor, on their second or third round in court.

“In most cases, they simply can’t pay,” said John P. Daughtrey, who was sheriff here until losing an election in November. “An attorney could explain to the judge why jail is not the solution and how to fix it. As a sheriff, I want criminals in my jail, not a debtor’s prison.”

Mr. Reddick and Judge Carson Dane Perkins of Cook County Superior Court in Adel both said they would welcome lawyers for defendants because it would make the process clearer and smoother.

“If we could extend the right to a lawyer to civil procedures where you face a loss of liberty, that would be good,” Judge Perkins said. “Lawyers can get affidavits from employers and help make cases for those who can’t pay.”

The Southern Center for Human Rights has filed a class-action suit seeking a guarantee of a lawyer for such cases in Georgia. Sarah Geraghty, a lawyer there, said the center had received thousands of calls from Georgians facing child support hearings. Among them was Russell Davis, a Navy veteran with post-traumatic stress disorder who was jailed three times and lost his apartment and car while in jail.

Georgia also offers a case study on the mismatch between lawyers and clients at a time when each needs the other. According to the Legal Services Corporation, 70 percent of the state’s lawyers are in the Atlanta area, while 70 percent of the poor live outside it. There are six counties without a lawyer and dozens with only two or three.

Mr. Bloss, who faced eviction in New Jersey, went to legal services, which won for him the right to stay in his apartment while his case is under appeal.

In Baltimore, where Mr. Hymes was accused of shining a laser at a police officer and assigned bail of $75,000, first bail hearings do not include a lawyer. Tens of thousands are brought through Central Booking every year, facing a commissioner through a glass partition, who determines whether to release the detainee on his own recognizance or assign bail and at what level.

“For the poor, bail is a jail sentence,” said Douglas L. Colbert, a law professor at the University of Maryland. A study he conducted on 4,000 bail cases of nonviolent offenders found that two and a half times as many detainees were released on their own recognizance and bail was set at a far more affordable level if a lawyer was at the hearing.

Mr. Hymes was relatively lucky. When he eventually faced a judge with the help of a public defender, bail was slashed to $200 cash. It took his family a few weeks to pay. A student of Mr. Colbert’s, Iten Naguib, acted as an intermediary.

“If there had been an attorney involved at the initial stages,” Ms. Naguib said, “Mr. Hymes would likely have been released much earlier.”